It is so easy to push the mentally challenged, psychologist seeking –
but denying it – Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate Services and
Cummins Real Estate Appraisals AND the sadly lacking non profit she
created that has been
SUSPENDED in the state of CA for over a decade.
Look what the diminished capacity Mary Cummins wrote now:
Mary Cummins:
“Amanda Lollar posts when she files motions, never posts followup when she loses."
I
do wish Dumbin’ Scummins would get a grammar book to learn proper
phrasing and punctuation. Oh well we will try to work around it as
annoying as it is. (Wait, didn’t a
California judge also find Mary Cummins “annoying”? Sorry, I got off topic there. Since Mary Cummins is stating that
Amanda Lollar,
the Queen of Follow Up and Proof (wherein we share that trait), I will
take the opportunity to show you the proof of every single action Mary
Cummins states is not so or did not happen. (Just like the psychologist
she swore to the CA courts she is seeing but denying she ever said
it). Can we all say, ‘
Whacko’?!
Mary Cummins:
“Amanda
Lollar filed a motion for contempt against me. Amanda Lollar said I'd
soon be in jail. She posted photoshop images of my head on a prison
inmate body saying I'm going to jail. Then all her other user names
liked and cheered her. She lost the motion. She never posted that she
lost. I'm not in jail. Amanda Lollar is the one who will end up in
jail.”
Aw, poor little wretched, diminished capacity Mary Dum-Dum does not understand any of this. Wait, I do not understand this.
Mary Cummins owes Amanda Lollar nearly (or over) $7 MILLION DOLLARS
for her “egregious as well as malicious as well as intentional
defamation” so what exactly has Amanda Lollar ever lost to Mary
Cummins? A motion for contempt has not been filed with the Texas or
California courts –yet- because I took the considerable time to check
all the cases involved with Mary Cummins and
Amanda Lollar.
So this is all Scummins lack of understanding the written word or a
case of her moral corruption which she will try to pass off as the
‘truth’. So where is the proof of all this? Exactly. It is probably
with all those animals she claims to be caring for – they are in
Never-Never Happened Land. Wait, maybe she is referencing when
she had to pay Amanda Lollar’s attorney sanctions for the contempt charges that were filed.
Well, if that is the case, here is the evidence (FOLLOW-UP) that Mary
Cummins was charged with and had to pay sanctions for her CONTEMPT OF
COURT. Geez, you would think Mary Cummins would remember
the course her failed life has taken before she makes all of her erroneous statements on the Internet which make her appear
very, very stupid and incapable of managing her life and much less overseeing the care of animals.
Mary Cummins:
“Amanda
Lollar posted that she filed a motion for vexatious litigant status
against me. Actually I should say Bat World Sanctuary donors PAID Amanda
Lollar's attorney Dean Rocco about $6,500 to file that motion against
me.”
Well which is it? First Mary repeatedly
states that she sued Amanda Lollar because Amanda Lollar and Bat World
Sanctuary “are insured”. Technically that statement supports the fact
that Mary Cummins appears to be somewhat of an ‘ambulance chaser’
looking for a quick settlement that most insurance companies embrace
rather than defend their customer. I guess she did not count on the
excellent insurance carrier for Bat World Sanctuary -Chubb- because they
do not settle with ‘c-r-a-z-y’. What an idiot! Bat World Sanctuary is
insured and it is Cummins herself, in her blogs, who stated she sued
Bat World Sanctuary because “they have insurance”. Then of course there are the documents to back it up.
Mary Cummins was found to be acting in “bad faith” by the judge on the case.
Cummins was using valuable court time with yet another frivolous motion
against Lollar. The judge said for the privilege of her actions she
would get to pay Lollar’s attorney fees. This never had anything to do
with “donors”. The insurance company pays the attorney’s and that is
why we all get insurance. Donors of Bat World Sanctuary, although given
their following, I assume would gladly give Bat World Sanctuary
whatever funds they need because Bat World has proven themselves to
their donors time and time again. But more importantly it is Bat World
Sanctuary that is an approved and certified ‘sanctuary’ by the leaders
in the world of animals –
Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries and the
American Sanctuary Association.
It is also Bat World Sanctuary who wrote the standards for bats in
captivity by which all government and other animal care professional
organizations abide. Scummins should have done her homework.
Oops.
Mary Cummins:
“As
I am of course not a vexatious litigant. A vexatious litigant is a pro
se who files over six lawsuits as a plaintiff within the past seven
years and loses them all because they were meritless. I have never done
that in my life. I filed and did not prevail on one lawsuit because of
jurisdiction. It had merit. The Judge never filed a final judgment
because she had no jurisdiction.”
This is so wearing on the rest of us that Mary Cummins
NEVER
gets anything correct. Ugh, here we go again. I will explain one more
time (because Mary has stated she follows my blogs but she insists they
are Amanda Lollar’s), the reason for an individual to file for a
vexatious litigant status. I will take that compliment any day of the
week; being thought of as a world-renowned animal expert, author,
lecturer, 2-time Indianapolis Prize Nominee, Animal Planet Hero of the
Year Finalist, etc. Anyway, back to Scummins. To set Mary straight yet
again, here is what a vexatious litigant is and the purpose of
vexatious litigation. Vexatious litigation is legal action which is
brought either by an attorney OR a pro se (person representing
themselves), regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an
adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be
the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions
in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. The
‘victim’ needs to show 5 meritless lawsuits or Motions filed with the
court by the same opposing party within a 7 year period. Note Cummins
did not even get that correct. Cummins is claiming she filed one in
that time-frame. Seriously? She has over or approximately
30 lawsuits
under her belt. According to what I have read, because Cummins is
presumed to be mentally unbalanced and representing herself in court,
the courts showed extensive leniency. What do you want to bet that is
about to come to a screeching halt because the courts are now stepping
on Bat World Sanctuary’s legal toes. I also count in excess of 15
meritless motions and 4 lawsuits Cummins filed and was
reprimanded by and Administrative Judge (the judge of the judges) for so doing.
Mary Cummins:
“Amanda
Lollar LOST the vexatious litigant motion. I proved that I'd only filed
and didn't win one lawsuit in the past seven years. I didn't lose. It
was dismissed because of jurisdiction. I could have refiled but didn't. I
do have grounds for a new lawsuit with lots more evidence of
defamation, harassment and criminal acts by Amanda Lollar.”
LOL.
Dum-Dum-Scum they did prove you were guilty of defamation but the
courts said they did not have jurisdiction. She could NOT counter sue
for the same reason (plus she had no evidence). The plaintiff’s in the
case submitted a virtual mountain of proof of her actions and it is
unfortunate the archaic laws were in place that allowed that judgment to
be dismissed in the age of the Internet where communication crosses
all borders. Scummins thought she had it made in life to apparently
victimize as many people as she wanted because she thought as long as
she did not attack anyone in CA she would just simply file a lack of
jurisdiction plea with the courts and it would be allowed. What
happened to her “Freedom of Speech” declarations? Oh, that’s right,
when Mary Cummins defames and malicious maligns innocent people it is
“Freedom of Speech” but when the TRUTH is told about her, opinions are
given, or written proof supporting her victims claims then it is
‘defamation’. OMG she is totally whacko and apparently in need of
meds. Another thing that bothers me is why Mary Cummins is doing
everything she can to get Amanda Lollar in California? Is it to hurt
the much admired Lollar? After all, t
he police filed a terroristic threat report against Cummins
and her harassment of Lollar has been noted. Perhaps Mary wants to
injure herself and claim it was Lollar who did it. She has past
postings supporting the fact Cummins sees a psychologist “for my
problems” (direct quote) and she inflicts injury upon herself when she
sleep walks. Hmmmm.
Mary Cummins:
“After Amanda
Lollar spent $6,500 to have her attorney lie about basic math and lost
she did not post that she lost. She still cheers herself on just for
filing the motion. She wasted $6,500 of Bat World Sanctuary's money when
she had no chance to win. Any five year old could have counted the
case. The Judge's assistant counted the cases in the filing. She counted
one case. Dean Rocco stated I had many, many cases. He counted over
seven I think. He counted the same case seven times giving the case
different names. The Judge's assistant circled the case number which was
always the same. There was more than one defendant.That doesn't make it
a separate case.”
Okay so Scummins is stating
that a licensed, and by all counts, very successful lawyer who commands
insurance company business (lucrative) and has beaten Cummins over and
over again, this is the person with the math problem, but
Dum-Dum-Cummins has all the answers. Uh-huh. The IDIOT does not even
know the laws concerning her own cases! The $6,500 in attorney fees was
spent defending Lollar against Cummins ridiculous attempt to gain a
restraining order against Lollar who lives like 1,500 miles away from
Cummins and has never communicated with her, according to court docs,
since Lollar sued Cummins in September of 2010. And it is NOT Lollar
who spent $6,500 to defend herself and it is NOT Lollar who owes her
attorneys $6,500. Are the rest of you scratching your heads about the
fact Mary Cummins has actually stated on the Internet that Amanda Lollar
lost the case? No, stupid Dum-Dum-Cummins,
you lost the case!
You owe the $6,500. No wonder the LAPD filed Cummins complaints in the
circular file and the courts communicated that they need one more
filing from Cummins and then the vexatious litigant status against her
should be entertained again. Remember, frivolous Motions do count.
Her Appeal in California has already been denied so she is taking a 2nd crack at it. God, she appears to be unraveling completely.
Mary Cummins:
“Dean
Rocco committed fraud upon the court. He lied in his declaration. So
did Amanda Lollar and the other attorney. Amanda Lollar stated that she
has NEVER communicated with me. I have a ton of emails from her. Dean
Rocco got another attorney to perjure herself and commit fraud for him.
She is Katherine M. McSweeney."
OMG, throw a net
over it to contain this apparently moronic drain on society. First and
foremost, how is it that every officer of the court (attorney), sworn to
tell the truth or lose their livelihood (practice) all perjure
themselves (no proof) yet Mary Cummins, the easily identifiable losing
serial litigant, is the only one telling the truth. She actually has
brought charges against licensed process servers and established
attorneys and you know what happened? Nothing because Cummins
fabricates lies about the people who are holding her to the law and she
NEVER has any proof of her malicious accusations. Take a look at
Katherine McSweeney and then take a look at Cummins. I think we know
what is in play here because it appears obvious that Cummins jealousy is
getting the better of her. McSweeney is blond, pretty, young,
successful. Basically she is everything that Cummins is not.
I told you so.
----------------
Amanda Lollar, Amanda, Lollar, Bat World Sanctuary,
Bat, World, Sanctuary, Bat World, Mineral Wells, Texas, lawsuit,
complaint, animal cruelty, batworldsanctuary.com, website, official, Mary Cummins,
Mary, Cummins, Animal Advocates, Animal, Advocates, Dorothy Hyatt, Kate
Rugroden, Larry Crittenden, John Hyatt, Martin Rugroden, animal abuse,
animal neglect, USDA, permit, Texas Parks & Wildlife Department,
Animal Welfare Act, violations, revoked, reprimand, restraining order,
TRO, crazy, mentally ill, 5150, uneducated. Mary Cummins
made false reports to government agencies about Amanda Lollar and bat
World Sanctuary. Mary Cummins has herself been reported for animal
cruelty, animal abuse, animal neglect, violations of the Animal Welfare
Act. She was investigated. Violations were found. California Department
of Fish and Game suspended Mary Cummins' permit for abusing a squirrel
with no eyeballs, making false reports and other violations. Mary
Cummins Animal Advocates is suspended in the State of CA. Mary Cummins lost her CADFG Educational permit. Mary Cummins was reprimanded by California Department of Fish and Game.
Mary Cummins lies about her lack of education. Mary Cummins takes
donations illegally. Mary Cummins has failed classes in animal care.
Mary Cummins is a cyber-stalker with serious mental problems.
And lastly, a plug for my favorite charity-
